If you teach live online, the tool you choose determines whether students simply attend or actually participate. For tutoring programs in particular, the choice is worth getting right: you need software that supports real practice, visible student work, and consistent lesson quality, not just a reliable video call.
This guide explains the difference between a virtual classroom platform and video conferencing, when each one makes sense, and how to choose the right option for your use case.
In brief:
- Video conferencing runs meetings. Virtual classrooms run instruction. If you need an integrated whiteboard and education controls, you want a virtual classroom.
- Tool-switching is the hidden cost of teaching on meeting software. When your “classroom” lives across multiple tabs, transitions slow down and attention scatters. Pencil Spaces describes the benefit as spending less time “herding tabs”.
- If you want consistent quality at scale, you need reviewable teaching signals. Pencil Spaces’ AI Coach is positioned to evaluate measurable dimensions like engagement and talk-time balance.
Quick decision rule
If students need to produce work during the session (solve problems, annotate, write, build artifacts), default to a virtual classroom platform. If the session is mostly conversation + screen share, video conferencing is often enough.
Examples: what counts as each (and what “hybrid” really means)
Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Best for check-ins, discussion-led sessions, office hours, and simple instruction where talking + screen sharing covers the lesson.
Virtual classroom platform: A tool built around a shared work surface and student artifacts, so learners can solve, write, and build in the same environment where they see and hear the tutor.
Hybrid setups: Zoom plus a separate whiteboard, plus Google Docs, plus an LMS, plus a quiz tool in another tab. This is common, but it creates friction. Every extra link and tab switch slows transitions, breaks attention, and turns “teaching” into tool management. If your lesson routinely requires three or more tool switches in a session, you’re feeling the cost of a hybrid stack.
What is a virtual classroom platform?
A virtual classroom platform is a live online learning environment built around teaching, not meetings. It includes video, but adds the layer that instruction actually needs: a shared workspace, lesson flow controls, and visibility into participation.
In Pencil Spaces, that means:
- A purpose-built environment where video and teaching tools live together, not a call with extras bolted on
- Classroom controls like recording settings and custom permissions
- Oversight features including live session view and aggregated engagement and attendance reports
The distinction matters. If the core workflow still depends on screen sharing and jumping between external tools, you’re running meeting software with extra steps, regardless of what else the platform offers.
What is video conferencing software and when is it enough for teaching?
Video conferencing connects people through audio, video, screen sharing, and chat. It’s designed for fast, stable communication, which makes it a good fit for:
- Parent-teacher conferences
- Office hours and quick one-to-one check-ins
- Guest speakers
- Discussion-led sessions where conversation is the lesson
Where it starts to struggle is when students need to produce work rather than just listen. Lessons need a shared surface for practice and feedback. Transitions matter: a session loses momentum when every activity requires a new link or tab. And teachers need more than attendance data if they want to improve over time.
If your session works with talk and screen share, video conferencing is often enough. If the lesson depends on practice, student artifacts, and real checks for understanding, a virtual classroom platform will serve you better.
What’s different in a real lesson?
How do students participate, not just attend?
Meeting tools are built for conversation. Teaching requires interaction.
In a real lesson, participation looks like solving problems together, annotating content, showing work in progress, and responding to quick checks for understanding. Virtual classrooms are designed around that kind of active involvement.
Pencil Spaces brings video and teaching tools into one environment, including infinite, persistent whiteboards and workflows that keep students spending session time doing, not just watching.
How do you manage lesson flow without tab switching?
The friction of teaching on video conferencing adds up. Even when every individual tool is good, the transitions between them create overhead for teachers and distraction for students.
A useful set of questions when evaluating any platform:
- How quickly can I get to the first activity?
- How fast can I switch between activities?
- Can students stay in one environment throughout the session?
- Do I finish class with visible student work I can review?
Pencil Spaces puts video, content, and activities together in one place so the answer to all four is yes by design.
What controls do educators and admins need?
Teaching environments need structure. Depending on your context, that might mean role-based permissions, moderation controls, recording options that fit your privacy requirements, and admin oversight across multiple classes or tutors.
Pencil Spaces makes these controls explicit: recording controls, privacy-aware recording, custom permissions, live session view, and aggregated reports. Features like Leader Mode help focus student attention during direct instruction, which is a genuinely different need from muting someone on a video call.
What learning signals can you measure and coach from?
Video conferencing tells you who showed up. Stronger virtual classroom platforms go further:
- Who contributed, and when
- When engagement dropped
- Whether student voice was present across the session
- What patterns emerge across sessions and instructors
For tutoring organizations, this matters most. When quality needs to be consistent across many tutors and many students, you need more than attendance records. Pencil Spaces’ AI Coach surfaces signals like engagement levels and talk-time balance, giving program leaders something concrete to act on.
Which should you choose for online tutoring?
If you’re selecting online tutoring software, you’re typically trying to get three things right: students practice during sessions rather than only listening, tutors can give feedback using visible student work, and program leaders can maintain quality as the program scales.
That combination usually points to a virtual classroom platform. It supports interactive, artifact-based learning, smoother transitions between activities, and participation signals that make coaching possible.
Video conferencing still works well for short check-ins, discussion-only sessions, and occasional meetings where producing work isn’t the goal. The question is which type of session you’re actually running most of the time.
Use-case guide: which should you choose (by scenario)
- Tutoring organizations (multiple tutors, consistent delivery): Choose a virtual classroom platform. You need repeatable lesson flow, visible student work, and reviewable signals that make coaching possible.
- K–12 and schools: Choose a virtual classroom platform when you need role-based controls, privacy-aware recording, and exportable reporting across classes for oversight and compliance.
- Higher ed seminars and discussion-first groups: Video conferencing can be enough when discussion is the lesson and activities are minimal.
- Corporate training: If the goal is information delivery, video conferencing works. If the goal is skills practice (role-play, labs, collaborative work), choose a virtual classroom platform.
Fast demo checklist (5 pass/fail questions)
- Can multiple students work simultaneously on the same shared surface (without turn-taking or lag)?
- Can you run a check-for-understanding (poll/quick response) in under 30 seconds?
- Can you switch activities without sending new links or asking students to open more tabs?
- Can you export records that show attendance and participation/artifacts, not just “who joined”?
- What’s the student join experience: no downloads, guest access if needed, and stable performance on typical student devices?
What to measure in a two-week pilot
Demos show features. Pilots show what teaching actually feels like on a platform.
Run the same lesson format on both tools and track:
- Time to first activity - Minutes from session start to the first student interaction beyond video: writing, annotating, responding, contributing.
- Artifact rate - Percentage of students who produced visible work during the session.
- Participation events per learner - Meaningful contributions divided by number of students.
- Prep time per session - Minutes to prepare materials and launch class.
If your program has a coaching layer, add a fifth: talk-time balance, which Pencil Spaces surfaces directly through its AI Coach.
These metrics are simple enough for a spreadsheet, but structured enough to support a real decision.
Security, privacy, and recording defaults
If you teach minors or run an institutional program, clarity here matters. When evaluating platforms, check:
- Whether recording is opt-in or on by default
- How privacy is handled for recorded sessions
- Whether role-based access is enforceable
- How easily you can pull reports across multiple sessions
If scheduling and reporting are part of your operational requirements, it’s also worth checking whether the platform supports attendance tracking and exportable reporting as part of the workflow (not as an add-on spreadsheet process).
The goal isn’t to capture everything. It’s to keep what you need to run instruction responsibly and meet your compliance requirements without it becoming its own administrative burden.
The bottom line: The simplest way to decide
If your goal is learning, don’t default to a meeting tool. Teaching requires interaction, student artifacts, and visibility into participation. Virtual classrooms are designed around those needs.
Pencil Spaces is built as an intelligent virtual classroom with integrated teaching tools, instructional controls, and learning signals that go well beyond a video call.
If your sessions are primarily discussion or coordination, video conferencing is often the right fit. But if students need to produce work, tutors need to give real-time feedback, and program leaders need to maintain consistency at scale, a platform built for teaching will make that possible.
Next step: run a short pilot and compare time to first activity, artifact rate, participation events per learner, and prep time. If students are attending but not producing work, or transitions keep breaking the lesson, you’ll have your answer.
FAQs
What is a virtual classroom platform?
A virtual classroom platform is software designed for live online teaching. It includes video, but also provides a shared workspace, lesson flow controls, and classroom management features so sessions are interactive rather than passive.
Is Zoom a virtual classroom platform?
Zoom is video conferencing software. It can be used for teaching, but most educators end up adding separate tools for whiteboards, activities, and student artifacts. If you need those workflows in one place, a virtual classroom platform is usually a better fit.
What is online tutoring software?
Online tutoring software is designed to support live tutoring sessions. Stronger platforms go beyond video to support interactive student work, session management, and the kind of data that helps tutors and program leaders improve quality over time.
Do I need an LMS if I have online tutoring software?
Sometimes. An LMS handles curriculum, assignments, and long-term progress tracking. Online tutoring software focuses on the live session itself: practice, interaction, and feedback. Many organizations use both, depending on how structured the program needs to be.
What features matter most for online tutoring sessions?
For most programs: a shared work surface, smooth activity transitions, tutor controls, and the ability to capture student artifacts. If you manage a team of tutors, coaching signals like engagement and talk-time balance become especially important.
How do I evaluate online tutoring software quickly?
Run a two-week pilot with the same lesson format and measure time to first activity, artifact rate, participation events per learner, and prep time. If the platform makes practice and feedback frictionless, those numbers will show it.
.png)
